Next, the student described specifics about the research design, including the sample, instrumentation, and data analysis.
Ecological and population generalizability were discussed. The student spoke at length on threats to internal validity.
This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.
That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.
High school coaches scored much higher than college level coaches in democratic behavior.
Solving A Word Problem - Review Of Research Paper Example
Junior high coaches were significantly lower in training and instruction than either high school or college coaches.Following the information on threats to internal validity, the student provided suggestions regarding how these threats could have been dealt with. Not only does the student know what the weakness of the study are, he provides ways the study could have been improved. Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. The first hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in overall leadership behaviors.One thing that was not discussed in this paper is the literature review. The second hypothesis was that differences on the RLSS would occur among coaching levels: junior high, high school, and college.There are a number of other factors that could effect the internal validity of the study, yet were not addressed by the researchers.Coaching experience would greatly effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study.The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS 6301.The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a 100 on his critique. A succint summary is provided in the first paragraph.With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.