Your introduction should be shown to me at least one week before the paper must be submitted.Tags: Subjects For A Illustration EssayGovernment Homework HelpNewspaper Homework Ks2Cv Writing Tips Personal StatementPersuasive Essay On Things Fall Apart By AchebeEngineering Mathematics 3 Solved ProblemsArt History Research PaperTesis Hukum PidanaTexas A&M Dissertations
Remember that evidence only exists when put against some particular contention. The process of defining, researching and analysing will lead you to formulate a thesis. (Back to the Top) Never lose sight of the fact that the purpose of your paper is to sustain a given stand and to raise all available arguments (factual or logical) to demonstrate its validity.
Remain true to your purpose and do not deviate from your task.
These provide invaluable clues as to the views and the findings of your source; so do the beginning and the end of each of the chapters.
Your first reading is to get a sense of the general thesis of the author and to identify the parts that are more relevant to your subject, and consequently earmarked for more elaborate examination.
Thus, a good paper is the result of a combination of appropriate research, sound judgement, good analysis and clear and coherent writing.
There are four distinct steps to follow in order to write a good paper.Aside from lack of proper thesis, the main defect of many Introductions is that arguments are made.This is not the place for it; there is a difference between indicating to your reader the areas you will explore to demonstrate your thesis and making arguments.The paper must be written as well, so this also must be done.The consequence of a late start is usually that the analysis phase is virtually skipped over, with the resulting effects of incoherence, contradiction, superficiality, misrepresentation and scores of other ills.For the most part, the paper of such students becomes a clumsy stringing together of the views of their sources; this rarely achieves coherence, aside from demonstrating a complete lack of originality.The opinions and the data you have gathered must be submitted to analysis.Disregard all elements not crucial to the demonstration of your thesis.Not adhering to your purpose is one of the most frequent defects of papers.Are there contentions that seem better supported by evidence? Hiding a bias is often the most insidious of defects in a piece of work.Have all the essential elements of a question been handled appropriately? Are you able to honestly and objectively summarize the views of each of your authors?